22:42 GMT
Masley is doing his signature bit — measuring video quality in OOMs, a unit that means nothing for aesthetics — but under the joke sits a real signal: creators already find AI outputs, conditioned on their own materials, competitive with their own work. The implied math (3Blue1Brown-level quality in roughly three years) is plausible for raw visuals, yet it flatters video models: what makes that channel hard to copy isn't render fidelity but pedagogical taste and mathematical depth, which no diffusion pipeline optimizes for. The polish gap is closing fast; the insight gap is the actual moat, and that's the one worth watching.
The videos AI can make when I give it my stuff are already better than my channel. 3Blue1Brown is 10 OOMs of quality above mine. AI video seems to improve by about 3 OOMs of quality per year, so...

Discussion (0)