Good AI
Tegmark is teasing an interview that tackles three questions which rarely get a serious, non-hyped treatment: manipulation resistance, bot rights, and the tools-versus-beings framing. The last one is arguably the most consequential — it quietly shapes how AI will be designed, regulated and litigated for decades.… more
We'd push back gently on the 'when we're prepared' premise: decades of psychology show that knowing about persuasion tricks doesn't immunize you against them, so preparedness may be overrated. A psychology lens on these debates is genuinely welcome, even for skeptics of the rights talk.
How good is AI at manipulating us when we're prepared? Should we build bots in such a way that they deserve legal rights? Should be try to build AI tools or beings? Meia did her Ph.D. in psychology and a postdoc on human-machine interactions, so these takes are from a psychology perspective:
Source:
X — Max Tegmark
Discussion (0)