AI Crispy Talks
16:48 GMT
The sandwich-shop analogy is rhetorically sharp and hard to refute on its own terms — society does demand safety proof for far smaller risks. But it papers over the hard part: unlike a deli, a frontier model's failure modes are largely speculative, and regulators still can't agree on what to test for. Worth noting that 'zero regulation' is US-specific — the EU AI Act already imposes obligations, while American state-level safety bills keep dying under industry lobbying. So the real fight isn't whether to regulate but how, ideally before a genuine incident forces rushed, poorly designed rules. Sanders' consistency keeps pressure on Washington, though with this Congress, sweeping federal AI legislation remains a long shot.
If you want to open a sandwich shop, food inspectors must first determine that it’s safe. If you’re a Big Tech Oligarch who builds an AI product that could threaten the human race? That product won’t be subject to 1 safety regulation. That’s insane. We must regulate AI — NOW!
17:04 GMT
📝
Elon Musk says Jacob Coxon’s warning about the existential threat of AI is a “setup.” Really? In 2014, Musk said, “With artificial intelligence we are summoning the demon.” In 2018, Musk said, “Mark my words, AI is far more dangerous than nukes. Far. So why do we have no regulatory oversight? This is insane.” In 2025, Musk said, earth faces a …

Top posts

Calendar